On 14 Feb 2016 15:56, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 2/14/16 3:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 14 Feb 2016 15:42, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > >> On 2/14/16 3:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it. > >> > >> that's not true, nor is it the central criticism, imo. > > > > can you list the projects that utilize eudev ? the repo doesn't > > that i can see. it is the central criticism imo when correct > > interaction with other projects is key. people rely on rules being > > parsed & run correctly, as well as information provided by udev > > matching what they are running/testing everyday. > > until patrick brought up the list of distros, i was only aware of > alpine which is a musl based distro. then puppy and slack came > forward. they build their entire system using eudev as the libudev > provider. if there were issues, they would bring forward bug reports > like any other project. > > so when you say "people rely on rules being parsed ..." i don't know > why those user bases are dismissed.
i'm not dismissing them per-se. i'm being practical here: i think you can agree that the combined developer base of alpine/puppy/slack(ware?) is significantly smaller as compared to the distros using udev. -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
