Michał Górny schrieb:
In a follow-up, upstream wrote about how you should only run udev together
with systemd, and if you don't want to do that (spelling as in original):
"we will not support the udev-on-netlink case anymore. I see three options:
a) fork things, b) live with systemd, c) if hate systemd that much, but
love udev so much, then implement an alternative userspace for kdbus to
do initialiuzation/policy/activation."
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019664.html
So it seems a bit more than only initialization is needed.
You're missing the third option which is a sane option, and jump
straight to pitchforks.
Are you serious? The quoted line directly above your comment shows
clearly that I have read and understood the third option.
If Lennart's single statement from 2014 is a reason to use eudev
instead of systemd-udevd, my statement from today is a more important
reason not to use eudev.
With the exception that Lennart Poettering is the lead developer of
systemd/udev, while such a thing cannot be said about you and eudev.
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
