Michał Górny schrieb:
systemd and udev share the same codebase. You can no longer build udev
without systemd. udev is only a sub-project of systemd now, hence the
name "systemd-udevd".
Of course, sure. But since you seem not to be able to understand
basics: this *does not* mean Lennart is the only person having
influence on how udev progresses. Sharing the same repository
and utility libraries is not the same as being the same thing.
Ok, apparently I am too dense to understand that the someone who is the lead
developer and visionary of a project naturally has the same say as someone
who is only bickering from the sidelines. Maybe if you had pointed out a
systemd developer who disagreed with Lennart's words I could have seen the
light earlier.
Also I am obviously unable to understand that when the kernel folks
complained about the "new maintainers" of udev breaking things, they would of
course never suspect that these "new maintainers" have anything to do with
systemd at all.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1368617
Seriously. You gave good reasons why udev should remain the default over
eudev, I acknowledged as much already. But do not continue the path of
labelling your opponents as stupid and their arguments as FUD, because this
is clearly not the case. It really doesn't help your argument, it just makes
you look bad.
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
