On 12/02/2016 11:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 23:21:34 -0800
> Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/02/2016 10:45 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> On 02/12/16 01:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:  
>>>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:24:29 -0500
>>>> Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:  
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
>>>>> <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:  
>>>>>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500
>>>>>> Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:    
>>>>>>> The devmanual states:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented
>>>>>>> letters, the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters.
>>>>>>> Uppercase characters are strongly discouraged, but technically
>>>>>>> valid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are uppercase characters strongly discouraged?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to follow upstream's naming convention?    
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's upstream's naming convention for Firefox?  
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea. What's your point?  
>>>>
>>>> That naming conventions are generally complicated and a mess, and that
>>>> no-one wants to have to remember whether it's firefox, Firefox, or
>>>> FireFox.
>>>>  
>>>
>>> It's also more convenient at the consone to just type everything
>>> lowercase.  I expect that's the primary reason it's discouraged.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>> That seems the most likely to me as well.
>>
>> We could make a more "user friendly" feature by setting up bash
>> completion for package names, but that sounds a) daunting, b)
>> error-prone, and c) probably not worth the time spent writing the
>> script(s) necessary.
> 
> There is a bash completion script for that for a long time now.
> However, it no longer works correctly with new bash-completion versions
> and it seems that nobody cares enough to fix it.
> 
Oh, that's good to know. I didn't find anything relevant with
'bash-completion' in its name in the tree. Where should I look for this
script?

-- 
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C  1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to