Anthony G. Basile wrote: > >> I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch > >> against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change. > >> I'll commit it after review. > > > > Please do not do that, Anthony. > > I don't have time nor the familiarity to properly maintain bitcoins > myself.
Understood, and no problem. I think it's especially important to be a bit conservative under those circumstances. > I will ignore all negative advice regarding this package unless it is > balanced with positive advice. That's cool. I tried to also be constructive in my mail - sorry if that didn't get through. I was saying that the patched version should probably be a separate ebuild. But Mathy's (sorry for the mistype in my last mail Mathy) suggestion to go ahead with renaming the USE flag but *not* flipping it to default on is also a good step. > Please point out what lines of the patch should be changed and what > they should be changed to, else I will commit the patch as > provided. All lines containing +knots should say knots instead. Thanks! //Peter
