* Michał Górny schrieb am 06.07.18 um 11:33 Uhr: > W dniu pią, 06.07.2018 o godzinie 11∶08 +0200, użytkownik Marc > Schiffbauer napisał: > > * Michał Górny schrieb am 05.07.18 um 20:25 Uhr: > > > W dniu czw, 05.07.2018 o godzinie 17∶37 +0200, użytkownik Marc > > > Schiffbauer napisał: > > > > +1 for 5 years or at least 3. > > > > > > > > Having to renew/edit the key each year seems crazy to me. > > > > > > > > I have my primary key offline only, so renewing/editing it is a much > > > > more time consuming matter than if I had my primary key always with me > > > > which I consider a bad idea because you do not need to. > > > > > > > > > > ...and you consider it a good idea to keep the primary key untouched for > > > 5 years? You don't even know if the medium holding it still works. > > > > Yes. Backup media exists at a different place. > > If you don't see it for 5 years, how can you be sure that it is even > still there?
Are you serious? Who tells you that I do not check from time to time?
I am sure there will always be some scenario which makes a key
unacessible in some way. I do not disagree with that. Its a matter of
propability.
And for the worst case there is a revoke-Certificate which can be used.
--
0xCA3E7BF67F979BE5 - F7FB 78F7 7CC3 79F6 DF07
6E9E CA3E 7BF6 7F97 9BE5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
