>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Michał Górny wrote: >> Should we really warn about a package that (in its default >> configuration) can only be installed if the user accepts non-free >> licenses?
> That's one of the reasons it's only a warning and not a USE flag. Still, "Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software or metadata unless it conforms to [a free license]" (Social Contract). If you really think that you must have that message, can you at least downgrade it to einfo or elog? That would still be very visible, given that it's in the pretend phase where there tends to be little output. Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
