On 8/8/2020 14:51, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new > systems from eudev to udev. > > This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since > they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be overridden at > the profile level if some profile needs eudev (the last time I checked, > this applies to non-glibc configurations). > > What do people think? > > Thanks, > > William
Is eudev broken in some way? If so, has a bug been filed? If not, why not? If eudev is not broken, then why your proposed fix? It works fine for new installs, having just done one myself. Seems like we aught to keep it that way. I count six open bugs against eudev right now, and none of them look to be critical, so I vote "no" on your proposal unless there is some verifiable reason why eudev is no longer suitable to be the default udev provider. -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27 177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
