On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:36 PM Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > On 5 Oct 2021, at 21:29, Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > I thought we were going to go with the github-pages type route > > (markdown, rendered online or locally.) > > > > So, the thinking was, we could allow somewhat shorthand > notes or for the people who want to invest more time, allow > the GitHub-pages type route. > > But I'm open to the idea of just recommending people > use that if there's no appetite for mixed types.
I'd argue we can add NOTES.md to packages (e.g. allow those files.) Then we modify packages.gentoo.org to render the markdown; or users can render locally or read unrendered. WDYT? -A > > > -A > > > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:28 AM Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> > >> This is a preliminary version/draft of a proposed change to > >> GLEP 68. > >> > >> I'd like to introduce a method for developers to signal anything > >> special about a package and how to correctly maintain it. > >> > >> Sam James (1): > >> glep-0068: Add notes element for package maintenance instructions > >> > >> glep-0068.rst | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- > >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 2.33.0 > >> > >> > > >
