On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 15:21, Kenton Groombridge <conc...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On 24/02/27 03:45PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> > look into formally addressing the related concerns.  In my opinion,
> > at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> > ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely.  In other words, explicitly
> > forbid people from using ChatGPT, Bard, GitHub Copilot, and so on, to
> > create ebuilds, code, documentation, messages, bug reports and so on for
> > use in Gentoo.
> >
> > Just to be clear, I'm talking about our "original" content.  We can't do
> > much about upstream projects using it.
> >
> >
> > Rationale:
> >
> > 1. Copyright concerns.  At this point, the copyright situation around
> > generated content is still unclear.  What's pretty clear is that pretty
> > much all LLMs are trained on huge corpora of copyrighted material, and
> > all fancy "AI" companies don't give shit about copyright violations.
> > In particular, there's a good risk that these tools would yield stuff we
> > can't legally use.
> >
> > 2. Quality concerns.  LLMs are really great at generating plausibly
> > looking bullshit.  I suppose they can provide good assistance if you are
> > careful enough, but we can't really rely on all our contributors being
> > aware of the risks.
> >
> > 3. Ethical concerns.  As pointed out above, the "AI" corporations don't
> > give shit about copyright, and don't give shit about people.  The AI
> > bubble is causing huge energy waste.  It is giving a great excuse for
> > layoffs and increasing exploitation of IT workers.  It is driving
> > enshittification of the Internet, it is empowering all kinds of spam
> > and scam.
> >
> >
> > Gentoo has always stood out as something different, something that
> > worked for people for whom mainstream distros were lacking.  I think
> > adding "made by real people" to the list of our advantages would be
> > a good thing — but we need to have policies in place, to make sure shit
> > doesn't flow in.
> >
> > Compare with the shitstorm at:
> > https://github.com/pkgxdev/pantry/issues/5358
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Michał Górny
> >
>
> I completely agree.
>
> Your rationale hits the most important concerns I have about these
> technologies in open source. There is a significant opportunity for
> Gentoo to set the example here.
>
> --
> Kenton Groombridge
> Gentoo Linux Developer, SELinux Project

A thousand times yes.

Reply via email to