On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:37:25 +0000, stephane ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with you however at this time users like me will use catalyst in > order to generate their > target.
Users like me want to beat the crap out of catalyst and chew up genkernel. > I think we all are awaiting for catalyst + spec file support and not > support of predefined LiveCD stages that suits only one person. Id prefer PROFILE="little-linux" ARCH="x86" TARGET="/mnt/cf" emerge system This way I can create system profiles for different solutions. When I want to upgrade a system I would be able to do emerge sync on the build system and rebuild an updated system by profile. > Looks like development of embedded in gentoo is restricted to a few > people ....It is a shame since I am sure lot of experimented embedded > guys with different experiences (networking/automation/...) should be there. I don't agree. I am far from a toolchains expert, fairly new to uclibc, and majorly ignorant to the challenges involved with cross compiling, or what glibc has that uclibc has left out, but the developers have been more than inviting to entertain some of my ideas listen to problems I create or problems I find that they've created. These developers are certainly not restricting the development of the project. If anything the portage project seems to be restricting alot of the ideas and desires that the embedded guys seem to have for portage's future. > >>I would like to notice people that an embedded project does NOT mean > >>always uClibc based!!!! > >>My project need not uclibc. (In my mind I think almost of catalyst) uclibc or bust! -- [email protected] mailing list
