-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Your ill-placed attempts at being clever are missing the point.
Portage is a mess. We don't need it to become more messy to the point
of maintainability.

Yes, no one fixing bugs (because they are all designing a grand
redesign of Portage) would be bad. However, this is not likely to
happen. It hasn't happened before. And now we have a bunch of great
new volunteers.

Sebastian even *told* you specifically how to do this properly. So
please do.

- -- 
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
http://plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlLYW7QACgkQRtClrXBQc7WgOwEAqOuBXIMZyWbXRyY9VQEbwDCg
tXmXa266YsSYgqRNlDMBAJTq9pyOvIhqhRPjLTrlA3EodPUSiDY5wRlMjSZ08xeE
=WljA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to