-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Dave,

2.6.5 is the first kernel that compiles for sparc64, and it
exhibits the same issue (I just tried starting from 2.6.1
and worked my way up).

For the sake of completeness, I also tested 2.6.7, and it
crashed in record time (17 minutes!)

So I'd offer that the "2.6.7 is fine" bit was just noise.

Josh


David S. Miller wrote:
> From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-sparc] 2.6 kernel and docs
> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:12:53 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> 
>>From: Josh Grebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:01:06 -0500
>>
>>
>>>First run it took about 2 hours to crash. I thought it might be an
>>>improvement, so I ran it again and it only took 1 hour to
>>>crash... Which is about the average it was taking before. Otherwise
>>>it looks the same I'm afraid.
>>
>>Ok, thanks a lot for testing.
> 
> 
> Josh, others, give me a little help for a second.
> 
> Can you guys clearly state that 2.6.8 is basically when the problems
> started to surface?  This would be an important clue.
> 
> I seem to remember a lot of talk about "2.6.7 is fine".
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCzgHZFAhB33r2ACYRAq7UAJ0V5qXxyoCHrMnWF1QDai+dcVenYgCgkc1O
qfPeJzreqSJ698qqaiAyROg=
=47y9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to