is there any down side to the 2.4 approach? does it do the same stuff? On 2/20/06, freshy98 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh nice! I will try that one my self instead of the 2.4 approach. > > Tom > > > Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Nick Smith wrote: > > > > > > > >>can you do LVM on sparc? the dm-mod module for it doesnt seem to > >>exsist on the install cd. how do you go about using it with sparc if > >>it can be done? > >> > >> > > > >Yeah, dm-mod is a 2.6 (and lvm2) thingie. > >For 2.4 you use lvm-user (instead of lvm2) and lvm-mod (instead of dm-mod). > >If you want 2.6/lvm2 you can try my experimental (as in doesn't work on > >many machine models and i know and i'm not about to fix it atm since > >it's silo having issues) livecd @ > >http://dev.gentoo.org/~gustavoz/sparc/experimental/ > > > >- -- > >Gustavo Zacarias > >Gentoo/SPARC monkey > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) > >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > >iD8DBQFD+gkWV3G/IBCn/JARAsanAJ94mWj7W+uTYcgGxyb3PvcgJbDF7wCfevzy > >eSJ2zMC+tVwsBE+3bJylN2I= > >=HFP4 > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > -- > [email protected] mailing list > >
-- Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for. -- [email protected] mailing list
