Yes I'm lazy and going to top post. world will take quite a few modifiers so maybe you want something like =>net-www/apache-2.0.44 although since .44 is in you could do >net-www/apache-2.0.44.
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:01:12 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For my part, I only want the ~86 builds for specific packages (at this point, Apache >2.0.44 is the only one.) I decided to change the "net-www/apache" line in my world >file to "=net-www/apache-2.0.44", which had the desired side effect of excluding >apache from the "emerge -up world" report (previously, this always wanted to >downgrade to 1.3.27.) I think that's a solution I can live with for now, but the >downside is I won't be alerted by "emerge -up world" when 2.0.45 makes it in to >portage. I'm not really sure what the best way to handle this is; perhaps what I >really want is ">net-www/apache-2"? > > Doug Gorley | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Spundun Bhatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:44 am > Subject: [gentoo-user] suggession for gentoo, ~x86-nosystem > > > Hi Gentoo-user, > > First of all thank you for all the good work, I tried both redhat- > > 8 and > > linux-from-scratch, but gentoo was the thing I was looking for. > > > > In last few days there was a discussion on the comparison of > > whether to > > use ~x86 or not in the make.conf. > > > > It seemed like most people wouldnt want to play with the essential > > system components too soon.. I feel the same. I was wondering if we > > could add a keyword like ~x86-nosystem which would allow the ~x86 > > maskedpackages from world which are not part of system. > > > > Does this sound practical? I cannot think of the problems that could > > possiby occure due to this. > > I would appreciate +ve/-ve feedback ideas/happiness/dissappointments > > about this > > Thanx > > Spundun > > ps: sorry for the bulk of spelling mistakes in my last mail. > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- Chuck Brewer Registered Linux User #284015 Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred. This entire domain and all associated e-mail addresses are located in the State of Washington,and sending mail to addresses at this domain is subject to the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington.
msg00147/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
