On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:39:09AM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote: > On Friday 06 Jun 2003 22:04, Jayson Garrell wrote: > > Are you using that 160GB drive on a ultra100 controller? If so thats > > why it's only using 127GB. I had the same thing, 33GB sounded a bit > > high for partition information, and got a ultra133 controller and it > > sees the full drive capacity. > > So that explains it. Yes, this is an ultra100. Thanks for the info.
It might not be if the controller is ATA 100 or 133 but the limitations of non ATA-6 controller you may want to check out a bios upgrade before the cost of a new controller since earlier controllers can not see beyond 137GB. http://www.upgradingandrepairingpcs.com/articles/upgrade04_02_02.asp Peace Jim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list