emerge -e world should re-emerge your entire system.
On May 30, 2003 10:32 pm, Jesse Jacobs wrote: > Hello Mike, > > Have u tried -e = empty tree? > > j > > Mike Bohan said: > > When run with world, it does in fact display many dependencies. > > However, system only displays two. > > > > > > diesel root # emerge -up --deep system > > > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > > > Calculating system dependencies ...done! > > [ebuild U ] dev-python/python-fchksum-1.6.1-r1 [1.6.1] > > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.3-r1 [1.3.1] > > > > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 22:00, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > >> What does emerge -u --deep system (or world) -p give? > >> > >> > This is only somewhat related, but it sparked a question in my mind. > >> > >> How does one rebuild the entire system/world if all the packages are > >> already up to date? > >> > >> > For example, my system reports... > >> > > >> > diesel root # emerge system > >> > Calculating system dependencies ...done! > >> > > >> > >>> Auto-cleaning packages ... > >> > >>> > >> > >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. > >> > > >> > * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. > >> > > >> > > >> > If I upgrade to gcc 3.3, it'd make sense to rebuild the entire > >> > >> system. Is the only solution to rerun bootstrap.sh? If this is the > >> case, is there a solution to rebuild all the world packages (even if > >> they're up to date as well) without manually specifying them on the > >> 'emerge line'? Thanks in advance! > >> > >> > -Mike Bohan > >> > > >> > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 18:56, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > >> > > On Friday 30 May 2003 22:53, Harald Arnesen wrote: > >> > > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> writes: > >> > > > >> has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet? what would be implications > >> > >> or undesired side effects from rebuilding my system? is > >> there direct confliction with glibc? i doubt it. any > >> suggestions from anyone who has more knowledge than i do > >> would be well appreciated :-) > >> > >> > > > > I have an Athlon XP and rebuild alsmost my whole system with > >> > >> gcc 3.3. > >> > >> > > > > KDE, QT, X, xine, xmms, most of the packages in 'system' like > >> > >> bash, tar, textutil, libtool, awk,sed, grep... > >> > >> > > > > Gcc 3.3 is fast.. and I had no problems so far, but I have not > >> > >> tried to build a kernel yet. > >> > >> > > > I have built 2.5.69 and 2.5.70 on an K6-2 with gcc-3.3. Seems to > >> > >> work fine (for me). No crashes yet, with 2.5.69 I had an uptime > >> of a couple of weeks, before I booted to 2.5.70 three days ago. > >> > >> > > 2.5.6X is still a nono for me.. every version freezes my system at > >> > >> bootup.. and 2.4.21-rc* is fine for me. > >> > >> > > Glück Auf > >> > > Volker > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > -- > > Mike Bohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------ Microsoft / Intel free ------------------------ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
