Collins Richey wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:32:59 -0400
daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On July 29, 2003 01:50 pm, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
Emerge sync was never really 'quick' as such. A lot of files
(~50000) files get updated each time including cache during the
'hang' that you mention.
so what're the chances that portage might be switching to a more
robust database-driven setup?
My $.02. I don't need to sync hourly, so it's no big deal. I'd rather
see time spent on making portage more robust.
Agreed! Just put emerge sync in a cron job or during the night, and
you'll never know how much time it took ;) Like you did with emerge
xfree... and kde.. gnome, etc..
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
