On Wednesday 10 September 2003 02:24 am, Davide Brini wrote:
> Hello everybody, here are some doubts I have.
>
> 1. In my /etc/make.conf, I have "-O3" for CFLAGS, but I see that some
> packages still compile using "-O2". Is this behavior intentional, for
> example because the package or ebuild author thinks that using "-O3" whit
> that package would be unsafe?
> Sometimes also I see, while a package is being compiled, that the
> compilation command line has both "-O2" and "-O3" in it. In this case, what
> is the optimization actually used?
Some things won't comiple correctly with 03, so the ebuild sets them to 02.
> 2. Since a recent Nvidia kernel module update, two or three days ago, I see
> the following line in my log when I start X:
>
> Sep 10 08:40:08 kermit kernel: 0: nvidia: loading NVIDIA Linux x86 nvidia.o
> Kernel Module 1.0-4363 Sat Apr 19 17:46:46 PDT 2003
> Sep 10 08:40:09 kermit kernel: 0: NVRM: not using NVAGP, AGPGART is
> loaded!!
>
> I've not recompiled the kernel recently, and glxinfo still says direct
> rendering is enabled. Should I worry about that message?
I thought AGPGART was the better of the two options.
> 3. In the virtual console I launch X from, KDE often writes some warning,
> like these:
>
> WARNING: KDE detected X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) \x08
> Major opcode: *
> WARNING: KDE detected X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) \x08
> Major opcode: *
> kdecore (KAction): WARNING: KActionCollection::KActionCollection( QObject
> *parent, const char *name, KInstance *instance )
> QDate::setYMD: Invalid date 139534236-1093768487--1073750552
>
> Apart from this, everything semms to work fine. Should I worry about this?
>
> Thanks
> Davide
Don't know ...
--
Stephen
From here to there
and there to here,
funny things are everywhere. -- Dr Seuss
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
