>-----Original Message----- >From: Stroller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:59 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Ah, -Os was by *FAR* the slowest! > >Arg! I'm in the middle of recompiling my WHOLE kdelibs using >-Os at the >advice of another poster here. >I really would like a definitive answer here, and don't have the time >for multiple recompilations myself. > >Stroller. > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=speed+%22-Os%22+%22-O 2%22&btnG=Google+Search
I've been thinking about doing the same thing you are for a little while. Basically from what I've seen in 2.95 Os was a little faster than O2 in alot of cases. In 3.2 this isn't true, but in 3.3 it swings back so that using Os could pick up some speed. I'm going to wait until 3.3 is stable until I do a mass recompile again. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
