HMM, i just tested this again, but with another track, and it seems it depends extremely much on what track it is
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 14:03, Spider wrote: > begin quote > On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:57:32 +0100 > Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some > > test, and they shows some extremely interresting things. > > > > hmm, redoing this myself disproves your idea : > > > 64306076 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav > 39895533 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.flac > > 59695216 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.1.bz2 > 59420810 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.2.bz2 > 59276166 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.3.bz2 > 59191431 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.4.bz2 > 59131072 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.5.bz2 > 59090523 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.6.bz2 > 59069941 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.7.bz2 > 59046659 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.8.bz2 > 59033482 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.9.bz2 > > 59895186 Depeche Mode - Sister of Night.wav.gz > > > The numbers are for various compressionlevels, and the .gz file was gzip > -9 plain and simple. > > > Source was the same as previous comparsion, which is my ultra cd thats > lying around here. > > //Spider -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against microsoft attachments -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
