I use vga=0x305 and it works just fine.
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 11:57, Frank J. Mattia wrote: > therein lies the problem. im not using an nvidia anything. im using a > matrox parhelia (which somehow i doubt is supported by the matroxfb. > but anyway.. when i get home im going to replace my vga= line with > video=matrox:vesa:0x1BF to see if that helps. vga= just looks like its > asking for problems (in its simplicity. i mean come on.. who ever heard > of any option in anything ever just taking a single paramter which > controls screen res, color depth, and fb.. etc... its just tooo easy..). > > i do have all of the proper config options enabled. thank you for your > advice though. if this doesnt work ill go back and rtfm some more. > maybe find that one kernel opt i missed. > > on another note.. would you have any idea about the mouse probs, or what > driver i should compile for a generic ac97 onboard soundcard? > > thanks. > frank > > SN wrote: > > >You have to use certain options for the kernel config, just do a search in > >the mailinglist archive for nvidia framebuffer and you will find the correct > >options you have to use. > > > > > >By the way I'm running 2.6 stable since yesterday, on my box everything is > >working X, nvidia drivers, sensors, alsa, sysfs. > > > >I just have one little issue at the moment, one programm while running needs > >about 20% of cpu time now with the old kernel it was between 5-10 percent, > >I'm just recompiling glibc and xfree to see if that helps. > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
