On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:32:24 -0500 Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 28 January 2004 12:52 am, James Lee wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 05:32 +0100, lukas wrote: > > > Have a look at my new signature! :) > > > > > > -- > > > ** PGP-key available on keyserver pgp.mit.edu ** > > > > > > Please don't sign your public mail unless your > > > PGP-key is available for everyone! > > > > I tried getting some people's public keys, but with every keyserver I > > try to connect to it times out (I can still ping it, though). I have a > > good firewall, but certainly don't block outgoing traffic. Do I need to > > open up a port? > > You can always go here and paste it in... > > http://www.keyserver.net/en/ > > - -- > > "The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely > no good." - Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) > KI4DPT > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAF1eBWMqSOYd58pwRApCFAJ98NL6fVNJv9oAC+GUSx+d5givDUgCdE/ov > dMDXlXcWNyVJQ0vKLpOAXZs= > =nCP5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- My $.02. The whole PGP concept is just a waste of band width on a mailing list, with or without public keys. I could really care less whether you are the authentic Phill Barnett (as your key may well prove) or Samuel Johnson per your signature <g>. I'm only interested in the content. It's just so much crap on the screen before and after what I'm interested in. It reminds me of the lamer who used to waste band width by including "don't you dare send me private mail; I'll trash it" on every posting. So here I am wasting band width, and I know from previous experience that those who prefer PGP are going to do it anyway. -- Collins - Denver Area - Gentoo stable kernel 2.6.2-rc1 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
