On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 12:48, Jakub Krajcovic wrote:
> make the following symlink
>
> # ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.6.1 /usr/src/linux
That makes little difference, as (generally) packages that need the
kernel headers look in /usr/include/{linux,scsi,asm} and not
/usr/src/linux/include/{linux,scsi,asm-*}. Oh, yes I've tried linking
/usr/src/... into /usr/include/... (which IIRC is what you had to do in
ye olde days, though apparently that won't work with 2.6)
Which leads me onto the other post;
Alec Berryman said;
> Last I heard a number of packages, maybe including glibc, wouldn't
> compile cleanly with the 2.6 headers. You certainly can fiddle around
> with the ebuilds and start using the 2.6 headers, though.
Yea, I didn't think they did (though it did take some testing etc. to
figure this out ). "A lot of conflicts, there are" (usually down to
redefinitions or undefined type usage... it's messy).
--
http://www.mattsscripts.co.uk/
- A great source for free CGI and stuff
That girl could suck the chrome off a bumper.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
