On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 15:59, Jerry McBride wrote: > On Sunday 01 February 2004 08:16 am, Matt Wilson wrote: > > > Last I heard a number of packages, maybe including glibc, wouldn't > > > compile cleanly with the 2.6 headers. You certainly can fiddle around > > > with the ebuilds and start using the 2.6 headers, though. > > > > Yea, I didn't think they did (though it did take some testing etc. to > > figure this out ). "A lot of conflicts, there are" (usually down to > > redefinitions or undefined type usage... it's messy). > > > > Hmmm.... Since upgrading to nptl which calls for an up todate glibc, linux > headera 2.6.x and kernel 2.6.x.... I haven't had any of the issues you ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Where are linux-headers-2.6? I couldn't find them in portage. -- http://www.mattsscripts.co.uk/ - A great source for free CGI and stuff Marge: Homer, remember you promised you'd try to limit pork to six servings a week? Homer: Marge, I'm only human. Principal Charming -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
