Apparently, though unproven, at 22:37 on Friday 22 October 2010, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem did opine thusly:
> > > I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question: > > > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce55de133ca592b638db758c9e457 > > > 370.xml > > > > > > > > An interesting read, until the rants start, we'll just have to wait and > > see. > > > > > > Well, there isn't any question as far as whether or not openrc is going to > be stabilized, there is however a question of what's going to be put in > ~arch afterwards, whether or not to use devicekit or whatever it's called > now. I don't have time to find them myself, but check out the two threads > named "The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo" and "openrc stabilization > update". The general consesus is that for now openrc will be stabilized > and the project has been brought back into Gentoo, so the question for now > is what the future of ~arch is. It's openrc-${PV}+1 - there's no question about that. Until someone actually ponies up and commits something other than openrc to the tree, it's gonna stay on openrc. I think you misunderstand what ~arch means. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
