Apparently, though unproven, at 03:44 on Friday 19 November 2010, Walter Dnes 
did opine thusly:

> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:20:52PM -0600, Dale wrote
> 
> > This is mine and it worked when I rebooted a bit ago.
> > 
> > LABEL=boot        /boot        ext2        noatime        1 2
> > LABEL=root         /        reiserfs    defaults    0 1
> > LABEL=swap        none        swap        sw        0 0
> > LABEL=portage    /usr/portage    ext3        defaults    0 1
> > LABEL=home        /home        reiserfs    defaults    1 1
> > LABEL=data        /data        reiserfs    defaults    0 1
> > 
> > I use a variety of file systems don't I?  lol  I hope that helps.
> 
>   I have my own weird setup that optimizes disk usage, without LVM.  It
> consists of a 256 *MEGA*byte / partition (ext2fs), some swap, and the
> rest of the drive is one big reiserfs3 partition mounted as /home.
> /opt, /var, /usr/, and /tmp physically reside on the big /home
> partition, but are bindmounted into the / partition.
> 
>    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/sda1               1      121601   976760001    5  Extended
> /dev/sda5               1          33      265009+  83  Linux
> /dev/sda6              34        1209     9446188+  82  Linux swap /
> Solaris /dev/sda7            1210      121601   967048708+  83  Linux
> 
> /dev/sda5               /         ext2     noatime,nodiratime,async       
> 0 1 /dev/sda7               /home     reiserfs
> noatime,nodiratime,async,notail 0 1 /home/bindmounts/opt    /opt      auto
>     bind                            0 0 /home/bindmounts/var    /var     
> auto     bind                            0 0 /home/bindmounts/usr    /usr 
>     auto     bind                            0 0 /home/bindmounts/tmp   
> /tmp      auto     bind                            0 0 /dev/sda6          
>     none      swap       sw                            0 0


Let me optimize that for you a little bit more:

A single 1T reiser3 partition mounted at /

This will optimize away the small performance loss introduced by that (empty) 
/ on ext2

Seriously dude, this looks like a dumb scheme that gives you warm and fuzzies 
but doesn't actually accomplish anything except increased complexity.

Feel free to publish verifiable metrics to back up your case.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Reply via email to