Apparently, though unproven, at 10:18 on Monday 17 January 2011, William 
Kenworthy did opine thusly:

> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:07 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 03:39 on Monday 17 January 2011, William
> > 
> > Kenworthy did opine thusly:
> > > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 17:26 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:13 PM, William Kenworthy
> > > > <bi...@iinet.net.au>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:41 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > I think that's well worded. He has insufficient memory when emerging.
> > > > 
> > > > If he's really running short of DRAM Then he might also do well to
> > > > boot to a console and do his emerges there. No memory given over to
> > > > other things like KDE or browsers, etc.
> > > > 
> > > > I am a bit surprised though that a -j1 type emerge would be running
> > > > out of memory on a 3GB machine. I just finished emerge updates on a
> > > > desktop with 4GB and only used 2.5GB which includes KDE, FIrefox and
> > > > a
> > > 
> > > > number of other things:
> > > I have a diskless 3GB ram atom system (mythtv frontend) and I have to
> > > arrange swap over nbd for gcc and glibc emerges - others just get very
> > > slow when getting to limits, or get flaky unless -j1 is used.  Havent
> > > tried OO on it yet :)
> > 
> > I'M flabbergasted. 3G is really a gigantic amount of memory and yet the
> > machine still runs out of the stuff?
> > 
> > Something is seriously wrong somewhere when code does this. I know memory
> > is cheap and all, but still ... that's just excessive
> 
> Your behind the times Alan - 3G was a huge amount 10 years ago ...


Not so much :-)

I too have db servers with 96G of ram. 5 of them, so I'm current. I'm just 
gobsmacked that a desktop needs 3G to build a compiler and system libs. It's 
consuming 2G to do that, I'll bet that 1.75G of that is pure wastage.

Much like authors who proudly declare that they spent 7 years writing some 
magnum opus. It's a sure bet they were drunk of 6.5 of them :-)




-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Reply via email to