Apparently, though unproven, at 09:27 on Tuesday 18 January 2011, Mick did 
opine thusly:

> BTW, it used to be that the kernel would not (easily?) access more than
> 128M  of swap for some reason and multiple 128M swap partitions were more
> efficient than a single larger space, but this has probably changed with
> amd64 processors and modern kernels.

That limitation was lifted a very very long time ago.

I'm not sure when it happened it was so long ago.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Reply via email to