In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>    
>>> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS
>>> on.  Just my personal opinion on LVM.
>>>      
>> This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two,
>> your photos etc. are irreplaceable.
>>
>>    
>
> It does to me.  I want to keep things so that if there is a problem, I 
> know how to fix it or can at least get to a point that I can get help on 
> it.  If LVM fails and I can't boot, then I loose everything on LVM 
> because I would have to reinstall from scratch.  If it fails just on my 
> data stuff, I can get help and fix it because I can still boot up and 
> get to my email program.  Also, I have the important stuff backed up to 
> DVD.  I would only loose things that I can download again.  I would just 
> rather avoid that and I'm sure AT&T would agree.  That's a lot of 
> downloading.

I have all my partitions on LVM except the boot partition. I've used LVM
for more years than I could count and have *never* had a failure related
to LVM.

I backup my machines to an external drive (2 backup drives actually)
using rsync.

If I have a failure and cannot boot then I just put in my Gentoo Minimal
CD (which has all the LVM tools available) and I can fix the damage. If
the damage isn't fixable then I can just copy over the backups.

LVM snapshots make live backups a breeze. Backups are always in a
consistent state and I've tested them and they *work*.

-- 
Regards,
Gregory.

Reply via email to