On 8/23/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthias Krebs schreef: > > And as > > someone else mentioned before, vesafb-tng is not a valid kernel > > parameter, so everything after it is ignored. > > In what world is this? If you're using vesafb-tng (added to the kernel > options by the fbsplash patch which you get with the gentoo kernels, > which is no surprise, given that it was created by spock, a gentoo > developer), then it most certainly is a valid kernel parameter (and was > selected in the kernel config output that was posted in a previous message. > To quote the author of vesafb-tng: "The driver name used in the video= kernel command line section is still vesafb, and not vesafb-tng. Thus, video=vesafb-tng:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid, video=vesafb:[EMAIL PROTECTED] being the proper form"
See his website at http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/vesafb-tng/ Cheers, Matze -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
