You should have a look at purebasic. Inline Assembler is possible here too! :-)
You are right C is a lot easier than Assembler. But Purebasic is a lot easier that C too :-) Am Mittwoch, 24. August 2005 19:34 schrieb A. Khattri: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Markus [utf-8] Döbele wrote: > > The code I think is not the problem. But I think it is still a lot of > > work. By the way I don't like C too much (we had a C Version once and > > only encountered problems all the time :-( Buffer overflows and all this > > nice stuff is a big problem of this language!) > > You mean it requires understanding pointers and attention to detail? > > Yes it does. > > An assembly programmer should find C easy (well I did anyway). > > > I started as a Assembler Programmer on the Atari ST (68000 Rulez!!!) > > I started on the 6502, then 68000 then 8086... > > > But all this is too much effort. Purebasic has a very syntax and for a > > basic dialect a very good performance. > > Shame BBC Basic isn't around anymore - it allowed you to mix assembler and > BASIC (and that basic at the time was one of the few that allowed > recursion ;-) > > > -- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
