Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 >> Rafa Griman <rafagri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Vaeth :) >>> >>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth >>> <va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with >>>> current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. >>>> Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. >>> >>> >>> So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was >>> "experimenting" a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) >> >> Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but >> on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo: >> >> Don't stuff around with CFLAGS >> >> Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS >> worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces >> him/her that it's actually vastly improved. > > > I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:) > Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing > "scientific", just curiosity) trying different options on different > partitions and see how they work out. >
Out of curiosity: What flags do you run now? Do you know which flag exactly caused the problem? They didn't seem too experimental though -fno-inline looked odd. Regards, Florian Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
