On 2012-12-25, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 02:10:28PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote: >> >> No, actually it doesn't. It just has the same kind of very generic claim >> that has been repeated several times in this thread (which is "why? >> because it won't work") and links to an article that explains why some >> udev rules would silently fail for all this time (for *years* now, I'd >> guess). >> >> The article does not describe a change introduced with 181, it describes >> what already happened with previous versions. I am not using >= 181 and >> I do see the issues the article mentions (it does not break here because >> I do not have a separate /usr, but I can see some rules that use stuff >> from /usr). > > You have such an obvious lack of understanding, and problem comprehending > English, we just don't need to post to you anymore. ;)
Please be my guest and explain me in which part of that article is it said that some behavior *introduced in udev-181* will break systems with a separate /usr. -- Nuno Silva (aka njsg) http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/
