On Friday 29 Mar 2013 20:37:20 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:44:14 +0000, Mick wrote: > > Why do wikis and the like suggest that iptables should be in default > > rather than boot runlevel? > > Why not? There's no need to start it especially early, as long as it is > running before the network comes up, and the init script takes care of > that.
I haven't seen anything in net.lo that waits for iptables and I seem to recall that the network interfaces are started before iptables is run, unless I start iptables at boot level. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
