On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:29:39 +0000, Mick wrote: > > > Why do wikis and the like suggest that iptables should be in default > > > rather than boot runlevel? > > > > Why not? There's no need to start it especially early, as long as it > > is running before the network comes up, and the init script takes > > care of that. > > I haven't seen anything in net.lo that waits for iptables and I seem to > recall that the network interfaces are started before iptables is run, > unless I start iptables at boot level.
The iptables init script contains "before net". -- Neil Bothwick Advanced: (adj.) doesn't work yet, but it's pretty close. See: bug, glitch.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
