On 02/08/13 07:42, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 02/08/13 02:27, William Kenworthy wrote: >> On 02/08/13 00:28, Tanstaafl wrote: ... > > so why follow with unreliable fork, when there is the official package > available with equal features? > >
easy - it works and while I had machines running some of each it was only the udev machines that needed continual maintenance in that area. The latest and greatest isnt always the best. I believe one of the goals of eudev was stability and the old way of doing things which I want and get ... after removing gnome3 and installing LXDE where I need a desktop (and LXDE is moving from gnome2 to QT, even better) I am getting less and less interested in creating ongoing pain for myself with udev/systemd/gnome etc. There may be bugs, but on my installations its been udev thats created the hassles. BillK
