-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/14/14 18:01, Guido Budack wrote: >> dev/null... grmpf... :-/ > > No, the filesize is and was the same... I'm really astonished... > Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to > discuss. I'll repeat the whole procedure when I'm back in Europe > at the end of the month and report to the community.... It doesn't > make much sense to hold an endless discussion now. I just can say > that the filesize is the same and as reported already before and > that my hashing wasn't successful in contrast to on other files. I > was just curious if probably someone has similar problems AND I saw > it as some sort of a duty to report it to the community. However, > if someone feels annoyed or bothered or however you call it in > english... wasn't intentionally...
How about using another md5sum executable/building it/using openssl? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTIw5pAAoJEK64IL1uI2haCZAH/0DyiBuoY+wl1ZKbe0CYgUxQ 8Z0GGHwYrpSZrYm1Pr22z7lBWeTGNCD64H/Pgvw0NhQx86mekYnooDLnsoiA4H8r mj0DeRwoqGtQdXBZqBNzLDQ/xmtKZXlb6cXqR/3Ugdstx8UeymmahcoVhN+Oy74c MG/SM45i93Y0ZD15If1Afq34OxRwYPDGxpRKIxS7u+SjDFhsi86o/oMsVahBpcRr PffiQXOqfvfB1IpOBgb3xznBEtVPGsTSXckoMykkruwOzGe3Z2UuoUETzSxJFyxG 0Gqk3pn8jm2BgfgB5F3rrBVgRgvkhY2WpBsa9dvtNpiDassTflnmX+h7PxvVm3g= =fJC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----