-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/14/14 18:01, Guido Budack wrote:
>> dev/null... grmpf... :-/
> 
> No, the filesize is and was the same... I'm really astonished... 
> Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to
> discuss.  I'll repeat the whole procedure when I'm back in Europe
> at the end of the month and report to the community.... It doesn't
> make much sense to hold an endless discussion now. I just can say
> that the filesize is the same and as reported already before and
> that my hashing wasn't successful in contrast to on other files. I
> was just curious if probably someone has similar problems AND I saw
> it as some sort of a duty to report it to the community. However,
> if someone feels annoyed or bothered or however you call it in
> english... wasn't intentionally...

How about using another md5sum executable/building it/using openssl?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTIw5pAAoJEK64IL1uI2haCZAH/0DyiBuoY+wl1ZKbe0CYgUxQ
8Z0GGHwYrpSZrYm1Pr22z7lBWeTGNCD64H/Pgvw0NhQx86mekYnooDLnsoiA4H8r
mj0DeRwoqGtQdXBZqBNzLDQ/xmtKZXlb6cXqR/3Ugdstx8UeymmahcoVhN+Oy74c
MG/SM45i93Y0ZD15If1Afq34OxRwYPDGxpRKIxS7u+SjDFhsi86o/oMsVahBpcRr
PffiQXOqfvfB1IpOBgb3xznBEtVPGsTSXckoMykkruwOzGe3Z2UuoUETzSxJFyxG
0Gqk3pn8jm2BgfgB5F3rrBVgRgvkhY2WpBsa9dvtNpiDassTflnmX+h7PxvVm3g=
=fJC5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to