On Wednesday 19 Aug 2015 10:28:48 Jeremi Piotrowski wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, John Campbell wrote: > > On 08/18/2015 06:38 PM, walt wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:03:31 -0700 > > > > > > John Campbell <jdc....@cox.net> wrote: > > > > I haven't really been following this closely but I haven't seen any > > > > suggestion to use "emerge -1 --quiet=y smart-live-rebuild" to remove > > > > the offending curses output. Hopefully emerge doesn't check/use > > > > curses unless it's producing actual output. > > From the initial post it seems that the binary that has a problem is > bash/sh. They are both linked against tinfo/ncurses. And since portage > runs using bash... you see where I'm going with this. You could maybe use > a different shell (although I can't imagine a shell not using the terminal > capabilities ;) ), but still wouldn't be able to use portage. > > > Maybe "emerge --quiet=y -a @smart-live-rebuild" > > Smart live rebuild only deals with live ebuilds. How would it help in this > case?
Anyone cares to explain what is a "live ebuild"? Then I may be able to understand what @smart-live-rebuild may be useful for. :-/ -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.