On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> There really wasn't much loud objection when the proposal came up >> again last week > > This does not mean that everybody agreed. > However, all arguments had been exchanged before, > so repeating them would just have been pointless: > Eventually a decision had to be made, and I am confident > that it was made by the portage team in the full awareness > of the positive and negative consequences of that decision, > because all portage developers had participated in the > previous discussion. > >
Sure, but the portage team can really only dictate the upstream defaults of portage, not tree policy. I don't disagree with them, but it wouldn't hurt to have the Council or QA weigh in just so that we're not endlessly bickering about whether it is official or not. -- Rich
