Hi, On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:45:13 +0100 "Daniel Pielmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This here: > > > > > /etc/hosts > > > > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > > 192.168.0.1 gentoo-vdr.linux gentoo-vdr > > > 192.168.0.2 gentoo.linux gentoo > > > ::1 localhost > > I think localhost is assigned to 127.0.0.1, or did i misunderstood > something? No, that's (usually) correct. But in the route excerpt you've cited above (please post "route -n" next time!) the route for "localhost" was set to "dev eth0". Also, the subnet was a /24 one, instead of the usual /8 for localhost. So there's some inconsistency between that file and the routes. The /etc/hosts you've shown looks good, please post dnsmasq's config. > the whole iptables config is generated by shorewall, i recognised this > different namings too. Hm, OK, you're sure the tables were empty and Gentoo's iptables save feature doesn't somehow get in your way? But anyway, the NAT/forwarding can't work for the reason I mentioned (empty FORWARD chain and DROP policy). -hwh -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
