> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:26 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader
>
> I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else,
> but what I _don't_ like is when you have both man and info,
> and one of them is very deficient (in grub's case, man). The
> description is different, less informative, and quite
> misleading. Instead, is should say either nothing but "refer
> to info pages"; or it should be the same as the info pages...
>
> would anyone agree?
That is exactly what a number of packages do I think.
I have seen many of them that the man page and the
info page were identicle. More often though it looked
like they made a decent man page, and coppied it to info.
:-)
ï¿½ï¿½í¢‹ï¿½z� ��(��&j)b� b�
