On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:20:08 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: > Isn't BL2 masked ~arch? I think it was when I originally ran into this > problem. Doesn't that mean that my system will upgrade stable packages > that MUST be run using a package that I have to unmask?
No. The BL2 init script provided with LVM must be used when running BL2, they should not be used with BL1. If you are seeing the warning messages it is because you have added the lvm init script to your runlevel when it should not be there. -- Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED],;It's%made in Taiwa~##$ ` #@
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
