Daniel Pielmeier schrieb:
> 2009/1/19 KH <gentoo-u...@konstantinhansen.de>:
>   
>> This link was great help for me. Told me everything and how to read the
>> blocker. So I did:
>>
>> #emerge -avC qt-4.3.3
>> #emerge -DuavN world (This installed qt-4.4.2)
>>
>> But now I do have a problem. When I run
>>
>> #emerge --depclean -av
>>
>> I receive the following output:
>> [snip]
>>     
>>>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>>>>>           
>>  dev-db/sqlite
>>    selected: 2.8.16-r4
>>   protected: none
>>     omitted: 3.6.6.2
>>
>>  x11-libs/qt
>>    selected: 4.4.2
>>   protected: none
>>     omitted: 3.3.8b-r1
>>
>> [snip some other qt-split-packages]
>>
>> What did I miss? This results in an infinite circle of unmerging and
>> emerging.
>>
>>     
>
> I don't think --with-bdeps will solve this issue as qt- packages are
> no build-time-dependencies they are needed at runtime too.
> Did the affected packages got installed by your previous emerge world
> command. My guess is that depclean wants to remove this packages
> because they are simply not needed by other packages. Did they really
> get pulled in when doing another world update after removing the
> packages?
>
> Maybe checking again your world file or the files in
> /etc/portage/package.* for something suspicious is a good idea here.
>
>   

Hi,

yes I had the blocker when running emerge -DuavN world . I unmerged
qt-4.3* and ran emerge -DuavN world again. That brought in the qt-4.4.2.
Tho investigate further:

equery d x11-libs/qt
[ Searching for packages depending on x11-libs/qt... ]
app-crypt/pinentry-0.7.5 (qt3? x11-libs/qt:3)
app-text/poppler-bindings-0.8.7 (qt3? >=x11-libs/qt-3.3:3)
                                (qt4? >=x11-libs/qt-4.3:4)
media-video/vlc-0.9.8a (qt4? =x11-libs/qt-4.3*:4)
                       (skins? =x11-libs/qt-4.3*:4)
net-im/skype-2.0.0.63 (x86 & !qt-static? =x11-libs/qt-4.3*:4)

Those are still depending on qt-4.3* but non are depending on 4.4.2.

I will try an emerge -1av skype to learn what it will depend on afterwards.

kh

Reply via email to