On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote > > > > > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote: > > > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another > > > > desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years). > > > > > > yeah good luck with that. Because gnome is moving in that direction > > > too. > > > > > There are other desktops besides GNOME and KDE. Actually I prefer the > > > > ICEWM window manager. I was running a 1999 Dell 450mhz PIII with 128 > > megs of *SYSTEM* ram until the summer of 2007. Let's just say that > > GNOME and KDE were out of the question for me. On my current desktop, > > ICEWM flies. But I also have a netbook, and again GNOME and KDE are not > > usable. > > > > > Seriously guys, you start sounding like luddites. Is new, must be bad. > > > > > Correction, is fat, bloated, and slow, must be bad. I wonder if > > > > Microsoft's anti-linux strategy is to have its agents infiltrate the > > linux developer community, and turn linux into bloatware. > > You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you are > just a stupid ass. > > It is not slow. > > You are the only one saying that. People who do use Nepomuk say that it is > not slow and does not hog resources (initial scan excepted).
you can even tell nepomuk how much memory it is allowed to use ...
