Dear Members, A question: Should we ban members sending their own papers to the list if these papers are not open access, or file-attached?
To allow this practice to continue seems like we're offering tacit support for closed access publication of geoengineering research. I note both the growing open-access movement, and the particular sensitivities around any perceived secrecy in geoengineering research. Furthermore, in practical terms, posted closed-access research is not available for non-academic list members, of which there are many. This clearly hinders subsequent list discussion of attached papers. I'd be very interested to hear members' views on this matter. Thanks for your time. A -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
