On 2017-10-02 09:13, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
As Bas said already it causes packagers headaches.
So, the solution is to take the toys away from the kids...
Please help us understand your point of view. Why do you want to keep
the C++ API?
I like Sandros proposal to disable the C++ API by default and provide a
configure option to (re-)enable it combined with the header to state
that the developer has considered the downsides of using the C++ API.
It seems to address you concerns too, it doesn't take away your toy, it
just raises the barrier to using it because its a toy that can easily be
used to hurt others.
Kind Regards,
Bas
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
