I see that the issue has now dropped and I apologize if it was because I mis-addressed my note below from earlier today.
But, just for the record, I want it to be known that we're cool with whatever decision is taken. So my attempt at an earlier response is pasted below. Dale ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Dale Lutz <dale.l...@safe.com> Date: Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:40 PM Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] RFC6 - Drop GEOS C++ API at GEOS 3.8 To: <geos-devel-requ...@lists.osgeo.org> The team here has advised looked over the situation and the constraints (as others have written in this list), and concluded that the proposal at https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC6 seems reasonable. The C++ headers become clearly "internal use only" but still available for sufficiently adventurous souls (such as we self-define as). So +1 from us. Dale
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
