That's right, GEOS 3.12dev doesn't compile in C++11 on gcc 4.8.5 either. See https://github.com/libgeos/geos/pull/726
Dan On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:15 PM Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > Just a side note to think about since we are discussing this. > > The only issue I see possibly is with the Redhat/CentOS systems. > > > > I know that yum.postgresql.org tries to offer the latest GEOS even on > ancient systems such as CentOS 7 which sadly many of my clients are still > on. I think though it uses the GCC shipping with these. > > > > Looking at one of these boxes, I see gcc 4.8.5 (and it’s running GEOS > 3.10, PostGIS 3.1) – just cause I haven’t upgraded it. I suspect I could > upgrade this to PG 15 and would get GEOS 3.11/ PostGIS 3.3.1. So I think > that would mean some of these systems won’t be able to run say a GEOS 3.12. > > Though I’m not saying that’s a reason to not push C++ 14. Just throwing > it out there as an observation point. CentOS 7 is on its last legs anyway. > > > > I haven’t checked what RHEL / Rocky Linux 8/9 ship with, I suspect it’s a > C++ 14 GCC so not a huge concern if that is the case. > > > > Thanks, > > Regina > > > > > > > > *From:* geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf > Of *Daniel Baston > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2023 1:25 PM > *To:* Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> > *Cc:* GEOS Development List <geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org> > *Subject:* Re: [geos-devel] Switching to C++14 > > > > For what it's worth, I can confirm that my pull request builds in C++14 > mode with gcc 4.9.4. > > > > Dan > > > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel >
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
