That's a lot easier to follow, thanks. Cheers, Torben
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 3:45 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, the GSIP has been revised with "volunteer", "researcher", > "National CVE Numbering Authority" and the exchanges separated for clarity. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Sep 15, 2023 at 11:54:19 AM, Torben Barsballe < > torbenbarsba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> The Feedback section read as a little confusing (probably because the >> tone of the document switched from descriptive to conversational). A short >> blurb providing some context at the start, or some indication of personas >> throughout ( i.e. quoted sections being identified as security researchers, >> etc.) would improve legibility. However, since this section is ultimately >> just examples and not procedure, this doesn't affect my vote one way or the >> other. >> >> Cheers, >> Torben >> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 2:37 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Proposal is here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-220 >>> >>> Overview is using the GitHub "private vulnerability reporting" to assign >>> CVE numbers we control to our known security issues. >>> -- >>> Jody Garnett >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
